27 March 2008
Million+ welcomes condemnation of Government ELQ policy by Commons
The report of the House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee enquiry into the withdrawal of funding for equivalent or lower level qualifications is published today.
The university think tank Million+ has welcomed the report and its clear, evidence-based criticism of the Government’s decision to stop paying universities a subsidy for the fees of students studying a course that leads to a qualification which is at an equivalent or lower level to a qualification that a student has already obtained (so-called ‘ELQ students’).
The chair of Million+, Professor Les Ebdon said: “We welcome this report which makes it clear that the Government decision on funding of ELQ students was ‘insufficiently justified’. The report evidences that the policy was ill-thought out, will have many unintended consequences, impacts adversely on women and ethnic minorities and introduces a host of anomalies.
At the very least the transitional arrangements and exemptions, which the Committee castigates as ‘inadequate’, should be immediately reviewed.
Even better, the Government should accept the advice of the Committee that the change should be left until the independent review of variable fees due in 2009 has reported.
When a Government policy will clearly not achieve what was intended, Ministers should put their hands up and admit that it needs a complete rethink.”
ENDS
Notes to editors
The summary of the report reads as follows:
“In September 2007 the Government announced that it was withdrawing state funding paid to higher education institutions to subsidise the fees of ELQ students, that is those studying for a qualification at the same or lower level to one they already hold. The result is that from 2008-09 students starting a second degree could see their tuition fees increase by 200%. The Government argued that its policy was in line with the recommendations of the Leitch Review of Skills to concentrate the extra resources that it is putting in to higher education on first-time students and expecting employers to shoulder more of the burden for re-training via second degrees. We found that consultation on the withdrawal of the funding was restricted to the implementation arrangements with the full effects of the changes and consequences for other policies such as the need for re-skilling inadequately examined. We conclude that the decision to cut funding to ELQ students was insufficiently justified either by persuasive analysis of its likely effectiveness in achieving the desired goals or evidence of the likely wider impact of the policy.
Nearly all the submissions we received were hostile to the changes. We conclude that the transitional arrangements and exemptions are inadequate – for example, the change will affect some groups of students and some institutions more than others – and inconsistent – for example, those pursuing Turkish studies are exempt but not pharmacists. We believe that the change would have been better left until the independent review of variable fees due in 2009, which would have been able to weigh funding of ELQs against other priorities.”
For further information, comment and interviews, please contact Professor Les Ebdon, Chair of Million+ and Vice Chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire, on 01582 489255.